Wuhan: Regierung holt 138 Staatsbürger aus Wuhan nachhause

Nein, diese Regierung hat garnix getan um die Thai zurückzuholen!

Der zuständige Aushilfsminister hat feige gekniffen.

Es flogen nur freiwillige Ärzte und medizinisches Personal!

Aber da diese ganze Show hier eh nur inszeniert wird um

von der Misstrauensdebatte für die famose Regierung

im Parlament abzulenken , hier ein Editorial der BP dazu:

Govt's record needs scrutiny

Editorial COLUMNIST

published : 5 Feb 2020 at 04:01

Make no mistake, the Prayut Chan-o-cha government needs the upcoming censure debate more than the opposition does. With dwindling public confidence due to a demonstrated lack of competence, alleged abuse of power and an absence of accountability, this government should use the no-confidence debate to tell the public how it will fix its mismanagement, change its administrative approach and address questions on its ethical standards, among other issues.

Government figures, including the prime minister and a government whip, seemed to be unhappy about the motion's "strongly-worded language" and retrospective scrutiny of Gen Prayut and other five cabinet members, who are the motion's targets, for things they did "in the past".

Such a misguided response is typical of Gen Prayut and some of his colleagues who have constantly hit back at critics and have failed to look at the big picture when handling national affairs.

Of course, the opposition is unlikely to be naive enough to simply take the six ministers to task for their not-so-gracious pasts.

Five of them — Gen Prayut, his two deputies, Gen Prawit Wongsuwon and Wissanu Krea-ngam, Interior Minister Anupong Paojinda and Foreign Affairs Minister Don Pramudwinai — were part of the former military government. They cannot expect the public to let them start fresh without being held accountable for their actions taken during the term of the past regime, especially when consequences of those actions still live on.

First of all, Gen Prayut did overturn the 2007 constitution, as mentioned in the censure motion, and let his lawmakers create the current charter that helped him return to power more easily. So it is pointless to exclude these facts from the debate.

The motion's accusations against Gen Prayut for having presided over violations of the rule of law and liberty of the people are also something that the premier has to be held accountable for.

Apart from the coronavirus outbreak, which has re-emphasised the government's flaws in its inter-ministerial coordination and public communications, other problems, ranging from a sluggish economy and PM2.5 dust pollution to drought and floods, are the same old challenges which remain unsolved.

The current administration has handled these issues by either opting to repeat previous approaches which have already proved unsuccessful or waiting for them to reoccur before issuing an ad hoc response.

Along with failing to solve chronic problems, the government cannot boast of policy achievements either, mainly because it has not managed to disburse the fiscal 2020 budget.

The government's ethical standards, with particular focus on the appointment of Deputy Agriculture and Cooperatives Minister Thamanat Prompow, the sixth censure target, despite his criminal record in Australia, will also take centre stage during the debate.

Many people have become fed up with the government because they have felt the pinch of the worsening economy, borne the brunt of toxic air in their neighbourhoods or suffered from floods and drought. Meanwhile, the government has shown no willingness to take any responsibility for problems on its watch. Gen Prayut himself has constantly blamed the people and told them to help themselves.

With a wafer-thin majority in the Lower House, the government will evidently not be brought down by the censure motion. Whether or not it will survive the court of public opinion is another matter

Do you like the content of this article?

79 0

Nicht vergessen, die Herausgeber der BP gehören selber zu den Unterstützern

dieser Militärdiktatur und haben alle kritischen Ausländer aus der Redaktion

entfernt.

Aber ich habe ja früher schon geschrieben dass selbst die Gelben Unterstützer

dieser Militärdiktatur schon lange genug haben.

Diese Militärdiktatur und ihre Führer haben gezeigt dass sie weder

in der Lage, noch willens sind Thailand zu führen sondern im

Stile eines wirklich armseligen Populisten jeder Sache nachgeben

die ihnen öffentlich schaden könnte.

Nur bei Einem waren sie konsequent: Beim eigenen Machterhalt.

Damit waren sie fast 6 Jahre beschäftigt. Fürs Regieren hatten sie

leider keine Zeit. Zu viele PR Termine.

Ich war viele Jahre lang ein Thaksin Gegner aus gutem Grund.

Aber gegenüber Prawit und Prayuth und ihren Kalfaktern

war Thaksin ja geradezu ein Ehrenmann !

Ich war auch für eine Militärdiktatur denn zur Demokratie

sind die meisten Thai garnicht fähig.

Aber wenn man antritt um hier aufzuräumen und etwas

besser zu machen als Thaksin und in den Freitagsmonologen

die Heissluftsprechpuppe Prayuth soviel Richtiges sagen lässt

und in 6 Jahren nur Sch…… gebaut hat dann hat man gezeigt

wozu man offensichtlich nicht fähig ist.

Wozu man fähig ist, zeigt man derzeit indem man den Wahlsieger

und seine Partei eliminieren wird.